It’s not going too far to say that antipiracy groups of all entities should be well-suited in identifying piracy. Claims to the contrary have to rely on reports generally being accurate. Those of us who have taken to screaming how ripe all of this is for abuse do so because of the collateral damage it causes. This is a strange omission, considering that creating ways for content to be taken down without a court’s oversight rests the entire reputation for this practice on reports of infringement being accurate. Whenever we hear new or renewed calls for more ways for antipiracy outfits and copyright holders to extrajudicially get content and/or sites taken down, there always seems to be one curious omission in the discussion: that antipiracy outfits generally suck at identifying actual infringing content. Wed, Jan 2nd 2019 03:18pm - Timothy Geigner
